The answer codec is used for skype video conferencing
![the answer codec is used for skype video conferencing the answer codec is used for skype video conferencing](https://eztalks.com/res/2021/03-16/12/a64e97f592d461bb464d0e61f97f9cd4.png)
- #The answer codec is used for skype video conferencing full#
- #The answer codec is used for skype video conferencing software#
#The answer codec is used for skype video conferencing full#
The advantages of this type of solution are plentiful: the quality is very high and very reliable the hardware is purchased in full upfront as opposed to an indefinite monthly fee pricing structure and you can communicate with any other business that owns a similar endpoint (and many do).
![the answer codec is used for skype video conferencing the answer codec is used for skype video conferencing](https://cdn4.explainthatstuff.com/voip-concept.png)
These processors allow high-definition, point-to-point video calls with any other endpoint following the same standards. Traditional hardware codecs are generally made by one of only a few companies (with Cisco and Polycom at the fore) and live in a rack in a conference room (or an “endpoint”).
![the answer codec is used for skype video conferencing the answer codec is used for skype video conferencing](https://jvnsystems.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Soft-Codec-In-Huddle-Rooms.jpg)
#The answer codec is used for skype video conferencing software#
Codecs can be pieces of hardware (hard codecs) or software (soft codecs). Short for “coder-decoder,” a codec is the video processor behind any video conferencing system. To establish context, let’s start by taking a quick look at the traditional video solution for businesses: standards-based, H.323 video conferencing hardware codecs. Rather, the article will give a basic overview of different video solutions and will delve deeper into a newer and increasingly relevant subset of the world of video: software-based codecs. Plus, hardware-based codecs like the SX80 have been around for a long time and examined in detail already. This article won’t examine them all in detail – a book would be a more appropriate length for that. Which video provider makes the most sense for which type of business? What are the differences between the various options? What are the differences between hardware-based and software-based systems? Can different systems communicate with one another? What do the various solutions actually cost? These are all extremely important questions that those responsible for the deployment of these systems are asking every day. Along with this common knowledge, however, comes a cascade of questions and decisions the answers to which are anything but common knowledge. Because of these developments, the case for the importance of video collaboration no longer needs to be made: it is now common knowledge. These trends are confirmed in a 2014 study by Wainhouse Research, a research firm specializing in Unified Communications: now only 54% of employees in small-medium businesses and 56% in mid-large work out of headquarters. An array of evolving phenomena has cemented this reality: the workforce is more globalized than ever working from home is increasingly common the necessary technology is more readily available and less expensive than ever workers are more and more tech-savvy and use video in personal capacities regularly. These days, video collaboration in the workplace isn’t a luxury, a rarity, or a perk. An Analysis and Comparison of Software-Based Codecs Against the Landscape of Video Conferencing